How a hospital & SKIN-CARTEL compromised patient safety
Our blog exposing covert & remote clinical obstruction and sabotage
is under construction-Bookmark & return
A hospital conspired with oversight to aid crime: administrators sabotaged a physician whistleblower’s clinic so dirty tricksters could justify perjuries (false allegations) that blamed the victim doctor for the saboteur’s chaos. This deadly frame and blame scheme intentionally compromised patient safety and harmed patients for political advantage.
By Nanette Liegeois M.D., Ph.D. (aka No No NanetteTM).
This republished article is being updated through 7/2023
Safety laws protect unsafe care
How US hospitals are not held accountable for medical malfeasance
- Create a safety hazard: administrators covertly obstruct and sabotage a clinic, and then
- Blame the victim physician by falsifying an incident report (IR). Congress granted hospitals privilege to “self-evaluate, critique, and improve” incidents that compromise patient safety.
- Weaponize the false IR as “evidence” to poison mandated but unwarranted fitness for duty exam and use the false incident report as
Healthcare is a blame game
Create chaos, assign blame whomever
- Head of HR-link to LeeAnn Vitalis
- Nurse demanded isotretinoin, couldn’t prescribe ->refusing to treat acne
EMR used to remotely sabotage clinic, falsify an incident report that blames politically targeted MD
- Create chaos-> Intent of emotional distress -> mandate fitness for duty exam
- Weaponize the incident report to assign blame on targeted doctor
- Link to gaslighting
SKIN-CARTEL co-conspirators weaponized EMR dysfunction as a malfeasance strategy, oversight and legislation do not protect doctors from this retaliatory patient care sabotage. Administrative obstruction made patients unsafe and victim doctors cannot prevent this intentional patient harm. Healthcare reform must address this legislation and oversight deficiencies.
Please share this to protect patient and public safety.
Hospital & Clinic Malfeasance
Please scroll to bottom to report healthcare crime
Wisconsin medical malfeasance recipe:
- SKIN-CARTEL stole a doctor’s Rx identity and sexually harassed the victim physician’s skin cancer patients.
- A hospital conspired to aid medical malfeasance: hospital nurses sabotaged the victim doctor’s patient care.
- WI oversight deleted illegal Rx drug evidence, denied denied due process, and refused to investigate (2014-present).
Kenosha cocaine clinic obstruction was identical to the hospital’s clinical sabotage: culprits blocked access to the electronic medical record (EMR) and oversight’s role in crime imperiled patient safety.
Chinese Translation Please

St. Croix Health arranged for computer setting set to the Chinese language.
St. Croix Health sabotaged clinic by setting computers to Chinese and mandated a doctor use paper to document patient care. IT failed to fix the issues. They blamed the doctor for no EMR patient documentation, called her incompetent and unfit, and her concern for sabotage was a paranoid delusion. Sabotage is an easy and can frame the doctor as having caused the problem.
WI clinic: lock out the doctor
After a drug dealing doctor (Dr. Steven Armus) stole another physician’s medical Rx identity for illegal Rx drugs, he and his wife (Racine realtor Ms. Kimberly Hood) sabotaged the victim physician’s clinic by locking the doctor out of the medical record (below) and harassing her cancer patients with phone sex letters. Instead of investigating clinic sabotage that killed cancer patients, WI oversight protected Racine healthcare crimes by deleting the evidence of medical Rx identity theft and called concern delusional.

Wisconsin cocaine dealer Dr. Steven Armus locked a doctor out of the EMR after his cocaine ring (cartel) stole her medical Rx identity. A doctor cannot document patient care if they’re locked out of EMR.
Federal investigators notified a doctor that a second Wisconsin clinic, St. Croix Health (formerly St Croix Regional Medical Center “SCRMC”) planned clinic sabotage to similarly torpedo the doctor. After EMR sabotage, they instructed the doctor to use paper to document patient care.* The Chief Medical Officer Dr. Jeffrey Hall falsely claimed she did not document patient care in a complaint to the WI medical licensing board. Preventing a doctor from proper care is dangerous, and in this case, they successfully and falsely claimed the doctor’s incompetency was causal. * note: SCRMC legal department approved clinic form October 2014 (bottom left NSG 501).
Please share this to protect patient and public safety.
Slow Computer Server Settings
It is impossible to document patient care if the clinic servers are set to slow speeds. This happened at both Wisconsin clinics, and prompted delayed, incomplete, and St. Croix Health mandated paper (above) documentation (then accused the doctor of not documenting patient care).

Yawn…computers ran slowly…and…

…sometimes…yawn…they failed to connect…
Teaching Mode Covertly Turned On
Federal investigators knew Dr. Armus used EMR to sabotage clinic; they did not need these screen shots. Dr. Armus and his wife, Racine realtor Kimberly Hood (formerly Armus), sabotaged EMR to distract from their theft of the physician’s medical Rx identity. The WI medical licensing board aided their illegal Rx drugs by deleting the evidence (Rx data) from WI state DSPS Rx database. WI DSPS attorney Joost Kap Esq. failed to respond to a question, “who deleted the Rx data?”

All EMR systems can be set to teaching mode (note the “?” on tabs) so the doctor thinks they are documenting a patient’s medical record BUT THEY ARE FOOLED BECAUSE IT IS ONLY PRACTICE MODE.
Please share this to protect patient and public safety.
St. Croix Health arranged for computer setting set to the Chinese language.
in progress…
Bookmark this page: we are adding clinical sabotage evidence.
Click below to listen to Dr No No Nanette podcast.
Join or connect if want healthcare reform
- Sabotage Rx EMR transmission (misspell provider’s name)
- EMR training that is incomplete or irrelevant for the clinic
Legislation and oversight reform please
Because a hospital or clinic’s EMR metadata is privileged, the targeted victim provider has no defense against a falsified claim of not documenting patient care. EMR makes patient care safer but, if used to sabotage patient care (and providers), it can end a patient’s life. Tampering with EMR can be used to retaliate against a provider who objects to improper patient care and fraud. This undermines both quality and affordability, a goal shared by patients, [ethical] doctors, elected officials, and 2022 candidates.
I welcome your thoughts and comments how legislation and oversight can change to remedy this patient safety failure. HHS OIG investigators took seriously EMR sabotage that escaped the scrutiny and sensibility of legislators and oversight bodies. Please contact me to discuss improving healthcare integrity, reporting mechanisms, and safety. White papers will be uploaded to ResearchGate. Institute MedicusTM is studying legislative and oversight barriers to quality healthcare becoming affordable for all Americans. I will be post comments on 10/25/22 and thank everyone for there kind and thoughtful support!
Nanette Liégeois M.D., Ph.D.
Week # 3 Question, October 18, 2022
Copyright 2023 Institute MedicusTM. All Rights Reserved





